How Driverless Cars will put Mobile Security to the Test?
February 28, 2018
Beth Kindig
Lead Tech Analyst
As GM CEO Mary Barra said in a keynote speech, “A cyber incident is a problem for every automaker in the world. It is a matter of public safety.” As Tesla, GM and many others continue to release connected vehicles – and soon driverless vehicles, the dangers are set to increase. In fact, more than half of the vehicles sold today are connected and vulnerable.
By 2025, the driverless market will be worth $42 billion up from nearly nothing with an official market entry still being anticipated [1]. Self-driving cars have the potential to save 292,000 lives annually from preventing collisions. This is in addition to the added benefits of reducing traffic and climate change, along with the costs of car ownership.
While gaining access to, and being able to control or steal a vehicle such as a Tesla is disturbing enough, it raises several concerns about not only connected cars, but also the mobile applications that extend the features of these vehicles. In fact, mobile apps are quickly becoming the main target for malicious behavior. Over the last four years, there has been a 188 percent increase in the number of Android vulnerabilities and a 262 percent increase in the number of iOS vulnerabilities. In addition, according to Gartner, 75 percent of mobile apps would fail basic security tests.
In another report, more than 80 percent of mobile apps on both the Android and iOS platforms revealed cryptographic implementation issues. Recently, Android malware has become more stealth and has begun to obfuscate code to bypass signature-based security software. Despite Google’s response to critical vulnerabilities and patches of critical issues in the Android OS, end users are still dependent on device manufacturers for these updates.
Driverless Car Security Infographic:
The main source of security and data breaches are found in hacking, malware and social engineering [2].
There are four major attack clusters in the automotive sector:
- Direct physical attack: Cars can be breached through the OBDII port and/or while in for maintenance or lent to other drivers.
- Indirect physical attack: A carrier is used to compromise the vehicle such as a USB stick, SD card, or through a software patch.
- Wireless attacks: Bluetooth and mobile networks including the current development of iOS and Android apps open up the vehicle to an abundant variety of attacks.
- Sensor fooling: As of yet, there are no known hacks documented that indicate you can take over a car by fooling the sensors alone.
Consumers are becoming more aware of the dangers around connectivity with 62% saying they are concerned that connected cars will become easily hacked in the future and 48% saying data privacy and security are extremely important. Executives of car manufacturers are also aware of the heightened concern with 52% rating data security and privacy as being of upmost importance to their customers [3].
While the path towards better cyber security for connected cars is a multi-actor road map, auto manufacturers who take the lead will be improving the security of their own brand and product will also improve the safety of their customer.
More To Explore
Newsletter
Token Growth is Surging - Here Are the Beneficiaries
The reality of AI demand growth has shattered early estimates for token processing, yet expectations continue moving up and to the right. In the second installment of our token processing series, we e
AI Token Demand is Shattering Forecasts
Total annual token processing is no longer measured in billions or trillions of tokens, but in the quadrillions and beyond. As annual token processing is now tracked in units with 15 trailing zeros, i
Nvidia and Google Are Crowding TSMC’s N3 Node - Can Intel Fill the Gap?
Nvidia is moving its next-generation Rubin GPUs from 4nm to 3nm, yet Google’s latest TPUs are already on N3 and are expected to remain there. Meanwhile, a growing number of AI CPUs from Nvidia, Amazon
Intel vs TSMC: How CoWoS Packaging Constraints Could Create an Opportunity for Intel Foundry
Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) is the single, most important company to the AI industry. However, to compete with the incumbent, Intel does not need to beat TSMC at leading-edge manufacturing. It only ne
Big Tech’s Free Cash Flow is Turning Negative – Who's Next?
Big Tech’s AI revenue is accelerating, but free cash flow is moving sharply in the opposite direction. Across Google, Microsoft, Meta and Amazon, capex is rising much faster than operating cash flow a
Big Tech Earnings Preview: Is AI Monetization Finally Catching Up to Capex?
The most pronounced difference between 2026’s tech rally compared to rallies in the past is which companies have been left out of it. The names most associated with the AI trade have hardly participat
Nvidia, CXL, and the Battle to Improve AI Inference Economics
This is Part 2 of our two-part series on AI inference economics. In Part 1 — Why Nvidia's Next AI Battle Is About Tokens per Watt, we laid out why tokens per watt has become the defining metric for in
Why Nvidia’s Next AI Battle Is About Tokens per Watt
As hyperscalers move from building AI infrastructure to monetizing it, tokens per watt helps to reflect if revenue is scaling and if profitability is improving. Offload engines can increase tokens per
Micron Is Up 900%. Here’s Why the AI Memory Trade May Still Have Room to Run
Over the past 10 months, memory chip stocks have gone from being solid beneficiaries of the AI boom to capturing a massively outsized piece of the return pie. The inflection in Micron’s performance de
Why the S&P 500 Shrugged Off the Iran War — and What Could Finally Break the Rally
On February 28th, the U.S. went to war with Iran, and the market was handed the kind of shock it hasn't contended with for years. The conflict set off a chain reaction across the region: an ongoing su
