Skip to main content

Data Center

How Mobile Devices and Cloud Computing Changed Security

Written by

Beth Kindig

Founder, CEO and Lead Technology Analyst

Published: June 12, 2018

Last Updated: June 12, 2018

Prior to the advent of mobile computing, security was limited to corporate IT assets that were often physically secured in facilities owned and managed by the company. According to a recent SANS Institute study, organizations spend as much as 12 percent of their IT budget on security.

In a Ponemon Institute study, it was found that organizations have a 27.7 percent probability of having a material data breach in the next 24 months at an average cost of $3.62M.

Meanwhile, the world of computing has changed. Security is not just about physically secure data centers and corporate controlled computing assets. Instead, end users have gone mobile, connecting to cloud enabled services, often with their own personal devices. And with the rise of the Internet of Things, there will be billions of connected computing devices on the planet in the next several years.

The primary consequences of applications getting hacked include financial loss, destroyed brand reputation, exposure to liability, and regulatory risk. Over 7 billion identities have been stolen in data breaches over the last eight years equal to one data breach for every person on the planet. Meanwhile, mobile’s rapid expansion has introduced a complicated and potentially hostile environment that is difficult to manage and protect.

64 percent of security practitioners said they were very concerned about the use of insecure mobile applications in the workplace with an average of 472 mobile applications reported as actively used in organizations.

Prior to the advent of mobile computing, security was limited to corporate IT assets that were often physically secured in facilities owned and managed by the company, on a network behind a managed firewall, and possibly in a datacenter with multi-factor access, physical security, and armed guards. Because the company owned those assets, they were able to dictate what applications could run on those machines, and actively manage and monitor them, providing the latest patches, endpoint security, and other controls dictated by corporate IT. Assets located in such places were implicitly trusted.

Today, the situation has changed. Mobile devices dominate the market, often as the primary or only way users access the Internet and the many cloud services available. These devices also have very little, if any, physical security. It is a well-worn path hackers use to access such devices to reverse engineer or tamper with the applications running on them, often through rooting, jailbreaking or hoodwinking the user.

Beth Kindig, founder and lead tech analyst of I/O Fund

Get Our Free Weekly Stock Newsletter

Get weekly stock insights, market analysis, and technology updates straight to your inbox.

  • Weekly stock insights
  • Market analysis
  • Technology updates

This shift has created all sorts of new business models to take advantage of the popularity of mobile devices.

 

These new business models come with new security problems:

  • New forms of payment using near field communications (NFC) on mobile devices are becoming popular in recent years. These applications require that credentials to authenticate users must be stored on the device. If those credentials are compromised, then a hacker can execute fraudulent transactions.
  • Mobile devices are being used in the automotive industry to enable remote parking from your smartphone. A compromise of the device could pose a serious safety risk.
  • In healthcare, patients are using mobile devices to manage sensitive information collected from various devices ranging from fitness monitors to blood glucose monitors to improve care and create data driven treatment options. A compromise of such a device can lead to a loss of privacy and sensitive information. Or even worse, if a device is hacked, it could potentially lead to life-threatening consequences for the patient.

 

Internet of Things

By 2025, the total global worth of IoT technology will reach USD 6.2 trillion with the most value coming from health care devices (USD 2.5 trillion) and manufacturing (USD 2.3 trillion). Meanwhile, we see a persistent lack of IoT security investment with 67 percent of medical device makers expecting an attack on their devices while only 17 percent taking measures to prevent an attack. These numbers are staggering when you consider U.S. hospitals have an average of 10 to 15 connected devices per bed with some hospitals registering 5,000 beds — totaling 50,000 connected devices per hospital.

Furthermore, traditional security solutions do not port well to the IoT world, due to differences in system architectures and resource constraints. Therefore, IoT security solutions have not evolved enough and are prone to numerous vulnerabilities.

About the author

Beth Kindig

Beth Kindig

Profile

Beth Kindig is the Founder, CEO and Lead Technology Analyst at I/O Fund, with more than 15 years of experience covering private and public technology companies. Known for her early Nvidia research beginning in 2018 and bold, high-conviction calls on emerging technology trends, Beth also manages I/O Fund's audited technology portfolio, which has returned 326% since May 2020, or 29.2% annualized. She is a regular guest on Fox Business and Bloomberg and has appeared on Real Vision, CNBC, Yahoo Finance, BBC, MarketWatch, Forbes, and more.

Curation

Expand your knowledge

View all posts
3 AI Trends Driving the 2026 Cybersecurity Stocks Rally
CYBERSECURITY STOCKS

3 AI Trends Driving the 2026 Cybersecurity Stocks Rally

Cybersecurity stocks surged in 2026 as AI-enabled attacks rose 89%. We look at how AI threats, AI labs and platform consolidation are driving demand.

CYBERSECURITY STOCKSOCT 31, 2026
Beyond Hyperscalers: Here’s the Next $1 Trillion AI Infrastructure Opportunity
AI STOCKS

Beyond Hyperscalers: Here’s the Next $1 Trillion AI Infrastructure Opportunity

Since 2022, Big Tech capex has been the clearest barometer of AI demand. But the market’s reaction to Google’s latest earnings shows investors are questioning how long that spending can last. While the market frets over hyperscalers’ cash flows, a second wave of AI infrastructure spending has quietly emerged, driven by enterprises and neocloud customers.

AI STOCKSOCT 30, 2026
Google’s $250 Billion AI Chip Opportunity Takes Aim at Nvidia
AI PLATFORMS

Google’s $250 Billion AI Chip Opportunity Takes Aim at Nvidia

In April, there was a major shift in the AI accelerator market, and for once, it didn’t come from Nvidia. Six months later, merchant TPUs are moving from announcement to commercial execution, with Google recognizing its first revenue from TPU systems in Q2 (from a small base). Last quarter, Cloud revenue growth accelerated to 82% for $24.8 billion, compared to $22.5 billion expected. In addition, new details around the TPU 8t show that Google’s threat to Nvidia is not limited to inference. At the time, we pointed out that Google may be one of Nvidia’s strongest AI challengers, as Big Tech is closest to the problems that accelerators must solve. The problem that Google is prioritizing is lower cost per token, with token economics becoming a predominant concern as AI spending is pushing Big Tech’s free cash flows into the red. Below, we discuss two reasons why Google’s AI story is about to change, not from advancements in AI software, but by going after one of the most profitable hardware businesses the tech industry has ever seen.

AI PLATFORMSOCT 23, 2026