Cybersecurity in Connected Vehicles Becomes Safety Feature for New Cars
February 01, 2018
Beth Kindig
Lead Tech Analyst
New car firms such as Tesla are promoting increasingly high-tech features that require a connection to the internet, which has propelled cybersecurity in connected vehicles forward as a major safety feature. Last year, Chinese security researchers from Keen Security Lab successfully managed to hack a Tesla Model S from 12 miles away. By focusing on Tesla’s on-board software, the hack targeted the car’s controller area network, or CAN bus, which connects the chips found inside the cars. In this hack, the Model S P85 and Model 75D were targeted. Tesla continued to make news in 2015 for safety concerns in cybersecurity of connected vehicles. In November 2016, security personnel from the Norwegian company Promon were able to use the Tesla’s Android app as an entry point to successfully hack the vehicle. What’s more, using the features in the app, the hackers were able to locate the vehicle, unlock it and drive away unhindered.
As GM CEO Mary Barra said in a keynote speech, “A cyber incident is a problem for every automaker in the world. It is a matter of public safety.” As Tesla, GM and many others continue to release connected vehicles, the dangers of cybersecurity are very real. In fact, more than half of the vehicles sold today are connected and vulnerable. This threat will only grow as manufacturers begin to release autonomous vehicles.
Cybersecurity in Connected Vehicles and Mobile Applications
While gaining access to, and being able to control or steal, a vehicle such as a Tesla is disturbing enough, it raises several concerns about not only cybersecurity in connected cars, but also the mobile applications that extend the features of these vehicles and others. In fact, mobile apps are quickly becoming the main target for malicious behavior. Over the last four years, there has been a 188 percent increase in the number of Android vulnerabilities and a 262 percent increase in the number of iOS vulnerabilities. In addition, according to Gartner, 75 percent of mobile apps would fail basic security tests.
Digging deeper, Veracode found that four out of five applications written in PHP, Classic ASP and ColdFusion failed at least one of the OWASP Top 10, implying that many web-based applications and websites contain security vulnerabilities. More than 80 percent of mobile apps on both the Android and iOS platform revealed cryptographic implementation issues. This attempt to protect and then doing it poorly highlights the importance of updated training and tools to aid these feature developers as they target secure and protected applications.
Recently, Android malware has become more stealth. Last year, in 2015, malware began to obfuscate code to bypass signature-based security software. Despite Google’s response to critical vulnerabilities and patches of critical issues in the Android OS, end users are still dependent on device manufacturers for these updates.
Tesla and other automobiles today can have the computing power of 20 personal computers and feature 100 million lines of programming code. While features such as web browsing, Wi-Fi access points and remote-start mobile phone apps, help to enhance the enjoyment of the vehicle, they also add more opportunities for advanced attacks. In real life, thieves are hacking keyless entry systems in the UK to steal cars, meanwhile, software recalls have doubled within the past year, and soon they will match mechanical recalls.
The mobile application industry is pushing forward a new level of interoperability that will require heightened security and privacy measures. App developers are in a position where they can reduce the number of vulnerabilities before the app ships. Auto manufacturers are also prioritizing cybersecurity in connected vehicles as a major safety feature to compete with features requiring connectivity.
This article originally appeared on Intertrust.com
Read more about how Intertrust’s suite of products helps automobile manufacturers address privacy and security in the age of the connected car.
More To Explore
Newsletter
Big Tech’s Free Cash Flow is Turning Negative – Who's Next?
Big Tech’s AI revenue is accelerating, but free cash flow is moving sharply in the opposite direction. Across Google, Microsoft, Meta and Amazon, capex is rising much faster than operating cash flow a
Big Tech Earnings Preview: Is AI Monetization Finally Catching Up to Capex?
The most pronounced difference between 2026’s tech rally compared to rallies in the past is which companies have been left out of it. The names most associated with the AI trade have hardly participat
Nvidia, CXL, and the Battle to Improve AI Inference Economics
This is Part 2 of our two-part series on AI inference economics. In Part 1 — Why Nvidia's Next AI Battle Is About Tokens per Watt, we laid out why tokens per watt has become the defining metric for in
Why Nvidia’s Next AI Battle Is About Tokens per Watt
As hyperscalers move from building AI infrastructure to monetizing it, tokens per watt helps to reflect if revenue is scaling and if profitability is improving. Offload engines can increase tokens per
Micron Is Up 900%. Here’s Why the AI Memory Trade May Still Have Room to Run
Over the past 10 months, memory chip stocks have gone from being solid beneficiaries of the AI boom to capturing a massively outsized piece of the return pie. The inflection in Micron’s performance de
Why the S&P 500 Shrugged Off the Iran War — and What Could Finally Break the Rally
On February 28th, the U.S. went to war with Iran, and the market was handed the kind of shock it hasn't contended with for years. The conflict set off a chain reaction across the region: an ongoing su
Nvidia, CoreWeave, and Nebius: Inside the Circular Financing of the GPU Boom
Neoclouds are one of the more hotly debated AI business models, with CoreWeave and Nebius being the two most widely recognized names. These companies have seen their sales, backlog, and share prices s
AMD, Nvidia, Arm, Intel: Inside the $120 Billion CPU Gold Rush
CPUs have gone from an afterthought to becoming the AI trade’s next great bottleneck – and with AMD, Nvidia, Arm and Intel circling a market that is doubling nearly overnight, the only question left i
Google TPU v8 vs Nvidia: How Inference Is Rewriting the AI Market
In April, Google announced it would begin selling its TPUs to select third-party data center operators, which is something the market has anticipated for nearly a decade. The TPU-versus-Nvidia-GPU deb
The AI Networking Stock That Beat Nvidia by 7X YTD for Returns of 135% YTD
AI networking stock Lumentum is among the key I/O Fund winners in 2026. We allocated heavily to LITE in January—a month before Nvidia backed the company. While most investors couldn’t stomach taking a
