Should We Build a Backdoor into Mobile Devices?
February 22, 2018
Beth Kindig
Lead Tech Analyst
Two years ago the San Bernardino shooting stirred a debate within the security community regarding warrant-proof encryption. The debate, known as “mobile backdoor access,” refers to exceptional access to encrypted communications and data by law officials. In theory, the Department of Justice wants technologists to “hide a key under the door mat” for law officials to access when they have the proper warrants. However, many security professionals and technologists have resisted this request due to creating weaknesses that are irreversible and require falsified automatic updates which may introduce other vulnerabilities.
Perhaps the biggest conflict for technologists, as pointed out by Herbert Lin, the Senior Research Scholar of Cyber Policy and Security at Stanford, is that anything less than deploying the best security (that is technologically possible) could constitute a neglect of professional obligation and ethics. Last November at the Intertrust LINE event, I had the opportunity to interview Lin, who is on the front lines of this debate. The conflict, as he pointed out in his keynote, exists in whether you can technologically design a system allowing exceptional access that is also secure. The security community says this is not possible while law enforcement says it is possible. Lin argues the parties are not talking about the same thing, as to talk about the same thing will require less-than-maximal security for users and less-than-desired capability for law enforcement (the proverbial grey area). In other words, maximal security is a technology issue, and adequate security is a policy issue — and it’s impossible to use a technical argument to solve policy.
Watch this 2 minute clip by Herbert Lin briefly covering the topic of mobile backdoor access: “Should We Build a Backdoor Into Mobile Devices?”
In his keynote, Lin poses questions that all sides must eventually answer during this debate and inevitable compromise, including tech vendors and the privacy community.
Questions we must answer for mobile backdoor access:
Questions for Law Enforcement:
· Why is law enforcement unwilling to acknowledge they’re asking the public to accept a lower level of cybersecurity?
· Why has a technical proof of concept not been provided? You think it can exist. Then prove it.
· How often and for what purposes are exceptional access capabilities expected to be used? If it begins for terrorism, when will it end?
Questions for Tech Vendors:
· Why do vendors provide password features if they’re against backdoors? This proves there situations where technologists have decided the benefits outweigh the consequences.
· How would exceptional access stifle innovation? Why should information technology not be subject to regulation? Lin points out technology is often subject to regulatory measures such as seat belts in cars.
Questions for the Privacy Community:
· What is the actual harm of having a back door? There are many people who are worried about being harmed that would not actually be harmed.
· How often are improper exceptional accesses expected to occur? The privacy community has the understanding there are to be zero improper uses, while one in 1 million or one in 10 million is more reasonable.
Click here to view the full keynote by Herbert Lin, entitled “Unresolved Issues Regarding Exceptional Access to Encrypted Data and Communications.”
Thanks for reading.
p.s. Don’t forget to follow me if you enjoyed this article! On Twitter @Beth_Kindig and on Medium
More To Explore
Newsletter
ServiceNow Q2 Earnings: Inside the AI Push Toward $1 Billion ACV by 2026
Last month, after ServiceNow reported second quarter results that exceeded expectations on multiple fronts, shares of NOW rose by 6%. The company is attempting to reposition itself beyond a provider o
Is Bitcoin’s Bull Run Nearing a Top? What the Herd Missed at $16,000 and is Missing Now
In late 2022, when Bitcoin was trading near $16,000, the I/O Fund issued a Strong Buy Alert. At the time, many of the market’s biggest crypto bulls were silent. Fast forward to today, Bitcoin is up ov
Is the S&P 500 Overdue for a Correction? 2025 Forecast & Buy Levels to Watch
In our last Broad Market Report titled, Historic Uncertainty Meets $7 Trillion Dollar Debt Wall: What Comes Next For The S&P 500, the S&P 500 was trading near 5800 and still well below its February hi
Google Stock Clears Major Hurdle, Yet One Serious Concern Remains
This week, Google cleared a major hurdle with Search accelerating from 10 points of growth last quarter to 12 points this quarter -- putting to rest many doubts that Search monetization is at risk giv
Can Oracle Become the Next $1 Trillion AI Stock?
When it comes to AI cloud leaders, Oracle is not often mentioned, yet the company is quickly positioning itself to lead among Microsoft, Amazon and Alphabet when it comes to cloud growth over the next
Robinhood Stock: Spot Crypto Volumes May Lead to Incoming Volatility
Robinhood’s fundamental transformation over the past two years has been nothing short of remarkable. Crypto is driving strong revenue growth at 50% YoY in Q1, while TTM operating margin is approaching
AI Stocks in 2025: What Every Investor Should Know
The market evolves quickly, and nowhere is that more apparent than in AI stocks, which continue to lead in both innovation and returns. At the I/O Fund, our deep coverage of AI stocks, combined with a
Nuclear Power Emerging as a Clean AI Data Center Energy Source
Data center power demand is forecast to surge over the next decade, with some estimates seeing demand increasing 3x by 2030. Inference is expected to be a primary driver with power demand growth proje
AMD vs Nvidia: The AI Stock That Could Win by 2028
Last week, AMD offered more details on the release of their groundbreaking GPUs with little fanfare in the markets – which is par for the course as AMD has a history of being forgotten about until the
This AI Stock is Set to Surge from Inference Demand
Up until now, the AI conversation has been dominated by training and compute, yet inference is showing signs of exploding growth. Microsoft and Google recently highlighted 5x to 9x YoY growth in AI to