• AI data centers are expected to consume up to 9% of all electricity generated in the United States by 2030. 
• AI GPUs have already tripled their power consumption, with Nvidia Blackwell raising the bar as the GB200 is expected to use up to 2,700 watts of power, up from 250 watts for the earlier A100.  
• Power consumption is the chokepoint for AI data centers that are desperate to lock in power purchase agreements (PPAs) to procure long-term power.

The artificial intelligence (AI) revolution is driving an intensely competitive race across various facets, from GPUs and ASICs to CPUs, storage, LLM models, and beyond. However, one critical component stands out as the key enabler for AI's future: power.

Simply put, AI cannot exist without the electricity that powers its applications, making energy the chokepoint for AI data centers. Electricity must be generated to keep these data centers running at full capacity, and there are five primary types of fuel sources: coal, natural gas, solar, nuclear and fuel cells.

AI and Data Centers Are Driving Up Power Consumption: 

Power consumption is rising with each generation of GPUs. Nvidia’s A100 max power consumption was 250W. Its H100 GPU consumes 350 to 350W and up to 700W with SXM. IO Fund wrote, “Nvidia’s upcoming Blackwell generation boosts power consumption even further, with the B200 consuming up to 1,200W, and the GB200 (which combines two B200 GPUs and one Grace CPU) expected to consume 2,700W. This represents up to a 300% increase in power consumption across one generation of GPUs with AI systems increasing power consumption at a higher rate.”

AI data centers need to meet this power demand, which is expected to surge with each generation of GPUs, which are now expected to roll out annually (rather than bi-annually). A single rack is used to consume 10 to 15 kilowatts (KW) of power, but current AI racks are now averaging 80 KW. The next generation is expected to draw 120 KW to 150 KW towards 200 KW within the next few years. This will drive data center consumption by 160% by 2030, where data centers could draw 9% of all the electricity produced in the United States.

Using Thermal Efficiency to Rank Fuel Sources  

AI data centers are actively trying to secure long-term power purchase agreements (PPA) and are even exploring nuclear energy options, as evidenced by the 20-year PPA Microsoft signed with Constellation Energy. Hyperscalers are also co-locating data centers near power sources to ensure reliable electricity.

To ensure reliable power, hyperscalers are increasingly seeking long-term power purchase agreements (PPA) and exploring various energy options, including nuclear power. This was underscored by the 20-year PPA that Microsoft signed with Constellation Energy marking the largest-ever PPA in its history. Constellation Energy will launch the Crane Clean Energy Center, restoring the Three Mile Island Unit 1 nuclear reactor, which will add 835 MW of carbon-free energy to the electrical grid.

While electricity is generated from various energy fuels, not all fuels produce the same amount of energy. Thermal efficiency measures how effectively a fuel is converted into electricity. For example, a thermal efficiency of 25% means that 75% of the fuel is lost as heat. Higher thermal efficiency means more energy is converted into electricity, while lower efficiency results in greater energy loss. Let’s see how the energy fuel sources size up.

Premium members receive real-time trade alerts on Nvidia (including 9 we sent under $20 in 2022), as well as deep-dive research on numerous AI stocks and crypto that we track closely. Learn more here

Sizing Up the Five Types of Energy Fuel  

These are the five energy fuel sources and their general thermal efficiency. These are general thermal efficiencies, which can vary based on location, technology and method:

• Solar PV: While solar photovoltaic (PV) panels produce renewable clean energy, they are also the least efficient, averaging 15% to 20%, or 17.5% midpoint. They generate electricity directly from the sunlight. Of course, sunlight is not available 24/7, and efficiencies can drop during overcast and precipitation.
• Coal: The world has been phasing out burning coal due to the high levels of carbon emissions. Coal-fired plants burn coal in a boiler, producing steam which flows into a turbine, spinning a generator to produce electricity. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) suggests 16% of the electricity in the United States is powered by coal. Coal has a thermal efficiency of 33%.
• Nuclear: The thermal efficiency of nuclear power plants ranges between 33% to 37%, with a midpoint of 35%. Interestingly, nuclear is not much more efficient than coal as it also uses steam from nuclear fission to spin turbines that generate electricity. However, nuclear plants don’t produce any carbon emissions, making them the cleanest energy option.
• Natural Gas: Gas plants produce electricity through two methods. The simple cycle gas turbine works through combustion by burning the natural gas in a combustion chamber to spin a turbine connected to a generator that generates electricity. This alone has a thermal efficiency between 35% to 42%, with a midpoint of 39%. Many gas plants use combined cycle gas turbines (CCGT), which use the exhaust heat up to 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit to boil water in a steam turbine, which adds an extra 20% to 25%, midpoint of 23% efficiency for a total of 62% thermal efficiency. There are carbon emissions generated from burning the gas.
• Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs): SOFCs can use natural gas, biogas, propane or methane to generate electricity. Natural gas is the preferred method, which produces an electrochemical reaction to produce electricity facilitated by a solid ceramic electrolyte. The thermal efficiency is up to 65%. However, using a combined heat and power (CHP) system will use the exhaust heat of up to 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit to be channeled to a steam turbine, adding an extra 20% to 25% for a total efficiency midpoint of around 87%.

This is the Clear Winner in Thermal Efficiency 

As depicted in the chart, SOFC has the highest thermal efficiency when used with heat capture to add an extra 20% to 25%. SOFCs emit carbon when using natural gas as a fuel source, but not as much as gas turbines since there is no combustion, just an electrochemical reaction. For zero carbon, hydrogen can be used as a fuel source. However, it takes electricity to make the hydrogen that will produce electricity, which defeats the purpose for now. Also, while hydroelectric power can have efficiencies as high as 90%, the problem is the location (need to be near large masses of water) and cost (dams are expensive). They don't generate enough electricity (from KWs to hundreds of MWs) to be cost-effective.

As the cost of hydrogen falls and the infrastructure supports it, then it may become a more readily used energy fuel. Natural gas already has the infrastructure and continues to penetrate as a preferred energy fuel. SOFCs are a cleaner way to generate electricity with higher thermal efficiency to boot using natural gas. Investing in the right energy infrastructure is essential to powering the next wave of AI innovation.

Stay on the leading edge of AI with I/O Fund’s high-performing tech portfolio, which had 7 positions outperform the Nasdaq-100 in 2023 for a cumulative return of 131% since inception. In 2024, the I/O Fund has 10 positions beat the indexes, many held at high allocations, and we are prepping for a strong 2025. Join our free newsletter here or subscribe to Advanced Market Signals for weekly webinars, entries, exits and real-time trade alerts.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Please consult with your financial advisor in regards to any stocks you buy.

Recommended Reading:

• Tesla Has a Demand Problem; The Stock is Dropping
• I/O Fund’s Top 10 of 2024
• 10 Timeless Free Articles You Won't Want to Miss
• AI Stocks Signal a Correction Before a Buying Opportunity Emerges