This article was originally published on Forbes on Nov 3, 2023,01:00am EDTForbes Forbes on Nov 3, 2023,01:00am EDT
Solar is arguably one of the market’s most sold-off industries at the moment, with the Invesco Solar ETF falling more than 42% YTD as the industry struggles to find growth in a high-rate environment. With implied Fed funds futures suggesting interest rates will remain above 5% through Q2 2024 before slowly dropping to the 3.75% range by year-end 2025, the industry is still facing a high-rate environment with more possible adverse demand effects for multiple quarters ahead.
SolarEdge and Enphase are among the S&P 500’s worst performers this year, falling more than 70% each; a significant weakening in US demand starting in Q2 worsened with weakening European demand in Q3, causing revenues to nosedive. Residential solar companies SunPower, Sunrun, and Maxeon have all declined more than 55% to 70%, as well.
SolarEdge Says Weak EU Demand Caused Q3 Revenue Slump
SolarEdge sent the solar sector for a tumble on October 20th as it pointed to significant weakening in EU demand for a major Q3 shortfall and lower Q4 revenues. Shares fell over -27% as the company cut its revenue guide nearly (20%) from $880M-$920M to $720M-$730M, its gross margin forecast from 28%-31% to 20.1%-21.1%, and its operating margin forecast from $115M-$135M to $12M-$31M. CEO Zvi Lando said the company “experienced substantial unexpected cancellations and pushouts of existing backlog from our European distributors” in the second half of Q3, while installation rates “were much slower at the end of the summer and in September.”
Q3 results reported on Wednesday showed a marginal beat in revenues to $725M, an 1190 bp contraction in gross margin, and a shift to negative EPS, but the focal point of the report was a brutal Q4 guide. Consensus estimates for Q4 heading into the report were floating between $660M to $675M – the actual guide was far lower, with SolarEdge pointing to $300M to $350M in total revenues, with $270M to $325M in solar revenues.
That correlates to a (55%) QoQ decline from Q3’s $725M, and (67%) lower than the nearly $1B in quarterly revenues SolarEdge generated in Q2. Non-GAAP gross margins are expected to decline another 1280 to 1580 bp from Q3’s 20.8% to just 5% to 8% in Q4, including a 130 bp benefit from IRA credits. Given the operating expense outlook and major gross margin contraction, SolarEdge could see Q4 non-GAAP EPS fall further from the ($0.55) reported in Q3 to ($2.40) or lower in Q3 — not even in the same universe at the $0.63 consensus estimate.
Sign up for I/O Fund's free newsletter with gains of up to 221% - Click hereClick hereClick here
Enphase Earnings Echo Demand Woes
Enphase echoed SolarEdge’s commentary about weakening EU demand, as European revenues fell (34%) sequentially in Q3, after recording +25% QoQ growth in Q2. That’s a pretty swift QoQ decline in European revenues, which Enphase attributed to “high inventory at our distribution partners along with a softening in demand in our key markets – the Netherlands, France, and Germany.”
US revenues fell (16%) sequentially in Q3, continuing a (12%) sequential decline in Q2 as high rates and the shift to NEM 3.0 continued to impact US demand. Management said that in California, the “sell-through of our microinverters was 25% lesser in Q3 compared to Q2 due to the NEM 3.0 transition. It will take a few more quarters for our installers to fully transition to NEM 3.0 and normalize sales to NEM 2.0 levels.”
For Enphase, US revenues have been declining, and Europe’s stronger growth is not enough to absorb the losses in the US; now, that picture is even clearer: California is set to drag on US growth until NEM 3.0’s normalization completes sometime in 2024, while European demand has weakened substantially. Combined, this is causing a snowballing decline in revenues that may not bottom until Q1 or even Q2 2024, one to two quarters later than previously expected.
Enphase guided a nearly (40%) QoQ revenue decline for Q4: $300M to $350M, compared to $551M in Q3 and $711M in Q2. Management provided some clarity on the very low Q4 guide, saying it “reflects approximately $150M of channel inventory correction in the U.S. and Europe. In other words, we are under shipping to the end market demand for our products by approximately $150M. We anticipate under shipment will continue in Q1 and expect our channel inventory to normalize in Q2.”
That raises some doubts about when microinverter shipments will bottom, as shipments are plummeting, falling (24.9%) sequentially from more than 5.1M in Q2 to just over 3.9M in Q3. Q4’s revenue guide suggests microinverter shipments could fall by ~1.5M QoQ to ~2.4M, or the lowest level since Q2 2021.
Source: I/O FUND
A quick V-shaped recovery in early 2024 for microinverter shipments and revenues looks to be out of the picture, based on management’s commentary around inventories and California’s normalization trend. In addition, US residential installations are projected to decline next year, while demand in the Netherlands may have peaked last year and fall through 2025 to 2026.
US Residential Growth Forecast to Decline In 2024
The near-term outlook for solar has definitely taken a hit from high rates impacting demand – a forecast from Wood Mackenzie/SEIA is pointing to a YoY decline in US residential solar installations in 2024, weighed down by a sharp contraction in California. Overall, the group expects installations to drop (4%) in 2024, dragged down by a (38%) contraction in California primarily due to the shift to NEM 3.0.
Q2 recorded growth of +6% QoQ and +30% YoY to 1.77 GW installed, reaching a new record. However, SEIA noted that “growth has not been as strong in traditionally larger markets with lower retail rates like Arizona and Texas, where high interest rates are creating headwinds.” That interest rate headwind has persisted through Q3, into Q4, and most likely will cause demand softening through much of 2024. Combined with a “lower urgency to go solar due to the ITC extension” and heightened recession fears, the broader macro backdrop for solar remains muddled, reflected by Enphase’s and SolarEdge’s troublesome revenue guides.
